如果学生签证被拒签,在AAT上诉期间努力学习有用么?

he relevant degree of satisfaction in this subclause is not based on whether an applicant has done well in their studies, whether they have diligently applied themselves to their studies, or whether they are likely to do so in future. Rather, it requires the Minister to be satisfied that the applicant is a genuine applicant for entry and stay as a student because he is satisfied that the applicant intends genuinely to stay in Australia temporarily, having regard to the matters set out in cl.572.223(1)(a)(i), (ii) and (iv) inclusive. The applicant submits that he is a “genuine student” in the sense that he is, and has been, studying courses here in Australia. That alone is not sufficient to satisfy the criterion. It does not address the aspect that was of most concern to the Tribunal, namely, whether he intended to stay in Australia temporarily. There appears to be no doubt that the applicant has from time to time diligently applied himself to the studies he has undertaken whilst living in Australia. The Tribunal did not doubt that he had successfully completed courses in the past. Whilst these were relevant matters, they had to be considered against his personal circumstances, his immigration history, and other relevant matters which the Tribunal found included his study history and the length of time he had already been in Australia, and proposed to stay.

Advertisements

关于 李博
李博,移民代理,管理学学士,移民法硕士。2003年留学来澳,曾在悉尼大学,国立大学学习法律课程并获得移民代理注册。帮助众多客户处理留学,移民过程中的签证相关问题。善于解决各类移民法律疑难问题。

发表评论

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com 徽标

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  更改 )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  更改 )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  更改 )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  更改 )

Connecting to %s

%d 博主赞过: