最新的2个影响雇主担保申请的判决

In Nguyen and Vu Publishers Pty Ltd v Minister for Immigration and Anor [2013] FCCA 1697, the Court held that the task for the Tribunal is to determine whether the nominated occupation corresponds to an occupation in the applicable instrument, and that such a judgment must inevitably compare the real duties of the nominated position with that of a specified occupation. In addition the recent decision of the Federal Circuit Court, Cargo First P/L v MIBP [2015] FCCA 2091, the Court said that what is required by r.2.72(f) is a determination of not only whether or not the position in question is genuine in that it exists, but also whether it really is what it purports to be. The second part of the determination necessarily requires a qualitative analysis of the position and its comparison with the occupation which has been nominated by the sponsor, not simply a determination whether the duties relevant to the position include the majority of those referred to in the ANZSCO description.

关于 李博
有丰富经验的阿德雷德移民代理。帮助上千客户成功处理留学,移民过程中的签证相关疑难问题。给客户提供及时,个性化的帮助 Adelaide migration agent with rich experience provided timely,personal and effective help for thousands of client with difficulty during migration or study in Australia.

发表评论

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com 徽标

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  更改 )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  更改 )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  更改 )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  更改 )

Connecting to %s

%d 博主赞过: