最新的2个影响雇主担保申请的判决

In Nguyen and Vu Publishers Pty Ltd v Minister for Immigration and Anor [2013] FCCA 1697, the Court held that the task for the Tribunal is to determine whether the nominated occupation corresponds to an occupation in the applicable instrument, and that such a judgment must inevitably compare the real duties of the nominated position with that of a specified occupation. In addition the recent decision of the Federal Circuit Court, Cargo First P/L v MIBP [2015] FCCA 2091, the Court said that what is required by r.2.72(f) is a determination of not only whether or not the position in question is genuine in that it exists, but also whether it really is what it purports to be. The second part of the determination necessarily requires a qualitative analysis of the position and its comparison with the occupation which has been nominated by the sponsor, not simply a determination whether the duties relevant to the position include the majority of those referred to in the ANZSCO description.

Advertisements

关于 李博
李博,移民代理,管理学学士,移民法硕士。2003年留学来澳,曾在悉尼大学,国立大学学习法律课程并获得移民代理注册。帮助众多客户处理留学,移民过程中的签证相关问题。善于解决各类移民法律疑难问题。

发表评论

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com 徽标

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  更改 )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  更改 )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  更改 )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  更改 )

w

Connecting to %s

%d 博主赞过: